Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 17945 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2003 13:05:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 17890 invoked from network); 12 May 2003 13:05:28 -0000 Received: from onramp.i95.net (205.177.132.17) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 12 May 2003 13:05:28 -0000 Received: from apache.org ([66.208.12.130]) by onramp.i95.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h4CD5S07018112 for ; Mon, 12 May 2003 09:05:28 -0400 Message-ID: <3EBF9C55.9020400@apache.org> Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 09:06:29 -0400 From: Berin Loritsch User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: Regarding Excalibur XMLUtil and Store References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N If it stays in Avalon, can we get some DOC writers to share how to get started with it? That is the biggest thing. Otherwise it's official release will be postponed. It is important for people who *want* to support it to actually support it. Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > Hi, > > here is my -1 to move XMLUtil or Store or any other common component > back to Cocoon. > I think Jeff and Nicola Ken have already given some good arguments > against the move. > > I really think the answer is plain simple: common components do belong > to a project (or subproject) or Avalon. And nowhere else. > > I'm really wondering what's the purpose of moving things is? A long time > ago many in Cocoon and Avalon gave their +1 for moving common components > to Avalon. Now some of them want to move them back. Strange. There was > no -1 at that time. > > And everytime you mention Avalon the first question you get is: "What > components are already available?" - So a common repository for > components which is somehow part of Avalon is very important. Noone > wants to first download Avalon and then some parts of Cocoon and some > parts of Struts or James or whatever to get common components. This > absolutely doesn't make sense for me. > > And yes, many users are using xmlutil and store outside of cocoon. > > I think, we should really avoid rediscussing such things and keep > our focus on the important issues. We have a long todo list and > again renaming and moving things is really not helpfull here. > > And it's not a matter of who has write access to a repository and > which emails are send. > > Carsten > > -- "You know the world is going crazy when the best rapper is a white guy, the best golfer is a black guy, The Swiss hold the America's Cup, France is accusing the US of arrogance, and Germany doesn't want to go to war. And the 3 most powerful men in America are named 'Bush', 'Dick', and 'Colon' (sic)". -----Chris Rock