Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 49283 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2003 12:30:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 49214 invoked from network); 12 May 2003 12:30:26 -0000 Received: from spoon.wincor-nixdorf.com (193.155.23.10) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 12 May 2003 12:30:26 -0000 Received: from label.wincor-nixdorf.com ([172.18.160.24]) by spoon.wincor-nixdorf.com (8.11.6/8.11.2) with ESMTP id h4CCUQj21567 for ; Mon, 12 May 2003 14:30:26 +0200 Received: by label.wincor-nixdorf.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 12 May 2003 14:30:26 +0200 Received: from wincor-nixdorf.com (pcme.wincor-nixdorf.com [172.18.175.245]) by ladung.wincor-nixdorf.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id KSTDTZ4G; Mon, 12 May 2003 14:29:56 +0200 From: "Enke, Michael" To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Message-ID: <3EBF9440.AD715414@wincor-nixdorf.com> Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 14:32:00 +0200 Organization: Wincor Nixdorf International GmbH & Co. KG X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [de] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.4-4GB i686) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, it_IT, en-US, es-CO, en-GB MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: _esql_connection.connection should be public References: <3EBF4C7C.B5BA85B8@wincor-nixdorf.com> <3EBF65FD.10206@dff.st> <3EBF6AE6.EBA1CE7F@wincor-nixdorf.com> <3EBF720C.1080607@dff.st> <3EBF7AF0.1EF964B9@wincor-nixdorf.com> <3EBF815F.1020107@dff.st> <3EBF886E.46B11760@wincor-nixdorf.com> <3EBF8D35.3080805@dff.st> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Torsten Curdt wrote: > > > IMHO a new esql tag would be the best. > > If we make it outside esql we have to care about all imports and try/catch > > and what else is realted to java.sql.* in the xsp. This is not necessary when > > we make it with esql. > > If we create a new tag for returning the connection, I propose also to create a tag > > for returning a ResultSet and ResultSetMetaData. > > Than we have more freedom in manipulating/assigning all kind of DB related data. > > not sure if ResultSet and ResultSetMetaData is really necessary but... > care enough for a patch? ;-) for variable asignment like: double d[] = new doubel[]; for(int i=0;ii Or can I? What do you think, you patch the Cocoon2EsqlConnection.java for getter methods, I send a patch for esql logicsheet? What should a choose for the tag names? Michael