Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 51132 invoked by uid 500); 8 May 2003 21:01:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 51119 invoked from network); 8 May 2003 21:01:22 -0000 Received: from smtp2.stanford.edu (171.64.14.116) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 8 May 2003 21:01:22 -0000 Received: from stanford.edu (lane-ts-yatesnt.Stanford.EDU [171.65.82.249]) by smtp2.Stanford.EDU (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h48L1QQN022629 for ; Thu, 8 May 2003 14:01:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3EBAC5A5.2010908@stanford.edu> Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 14:01:25 -0700 From: Charles Yates User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030404 Minotaur/0.1a X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19324] - XSLTC doesn't like Cocoon's pseudo protocol References: <20030508195446.591.qmail@nagoya.betaversion.org> In-Reply-To: <20030508195446.591.qmail@nagoya.betaversion.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N In the last week I've started getting ready for the upcoming 2.1 release and noticed this problem. I keep my stuff in cvs and I have notes to the effect of 'got 2.1 working' on commits of 4 weeks ago and no sign of the problem. At that point I remember having a separate xsltc.jar. Charles bugzilla@apache.org wrote: > > What |Removed |Added >---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Summary|XSLTC doesn't like |XSLTC doesn't like Cocoon's > |"context://" pseudo protocol|pseudo protocol > |in xsl:include statements | > > > >------- Additional Comments From joerg.heinicke@gmx.de 2003-05-08 19:54 ------- > > >>this worked with xsltc in (...) 2.1-dev until recently >> >> > >Are you sure? The Xalan version and so XSLTC were shortly (2 days ago) updated >to 2.pre6. And two weeks ago to 2.5. What was the last working version for you? > >Joerg > > >