Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 7912 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2003 13:44:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 7822 invoked from network); 7 May 2003 13:44:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO trinity.anyware-tech.com) (217.112.237.100) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 7 May 2003 13:44:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 31275 invoked from network); 7 May 2003 13:44:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO anyware-tech.com) (10.1.0.254) by trinity.anyware-tech.com with SMTP; 7 May 2003 13:44:01 -0000 Message-ID: <3EB90DA2.1060606@anyware-tech.com> Date: Wed, 07 May 2003 15:44:02 +0200 From: Sylvain Wallez Organization: Anyware Technologies User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 X-Accept-Language: fr, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE RESULTS] allow redirects in handle-errors References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Carsten Ziegeler wrote: >Sylvain Wallez wrote: > > >>Folks, >> >>Here are the vote results about allowing redirects in handle-errors (see >>[1]) : >>+1 : Sylvain, Bertrand, Carsten >>-1 : Stephan, Nicola Ken, John, Pier, Peter >>-0 : Stefano, Torsten >> >>The result is clear : redirects should not be allowed in handle-errors. >> >>So I will undo my changes. >> >> >I'm -1 on undoing changes :) (Yes, a deadlock!) > >Seriously, any chance to make this perhaps configurable, so that I >can allow redirects for rapid prototyping? This is my last attempt, >if noone finds the configuration valuable, then let's disallow redirects >in handle-errors. > I don't like this kind of configuration, as it will introduce sitemap language dialects that may cause more harm than good... >But: we are only speaking about the redirect-to tag, right? > > Yep. And although we won't be able to redirect the "normal way" using , we're still able to do it the "hard way" inside an action. But we shouldn't provide this action as part of the Cocoon distro ;-) Some things I understood in the discussion is that we shouldn't let the loaded gun on the table, but if people want to open the cupboard to take the gun then it's their problem and their responsibility. Sylvain -- Sylvain Wallez Anyware Technologies http://www.apache.org/~sylvain http://www.anyware-tech.com { XML, Java, Cocoon, OpenSource }*{ Training, Consulting, Projects }