From cocoon-dev-return-41220-apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive=xml.apache.org@xml.apache.org Thu May 01 16:39:13 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 86540 invoked by uid 500); 1 May 2003 16:39:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 86527 invoked from network); 1 May 2003 16:39:11 -0000 Received: from exchange.sun.com (192.18.33.10) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 1 May 2003 16:39:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 4271 invoked by uid 50); 1 May 2003 16:41:13 -0000 Date: 1 May 2003 16:41:13 -0000 Message-ID: <20030501164113.4270.qmail@nagoya.betaversion.org> From: bugzilla@apache.org To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Cc: Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19508] - [PATCH] samples for Batik block, updating svgxml serializer configuration in root sitemap and request on update for batik.jar X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19508 [PATCH] samples for Batik block, updating svgxml serializer configuration in root sitemap and request on update for batik.jar ------- Additional Comments From joerg.heinicke@gmx.de 2003-05-01 16:41 ------- > Do you mean an entry for "svgxml" in svg.serializer.xmap? No, I meant the sitemap in src/webapp. There is also the serializer "svgxml" defined, because the Batik block is not necessary for serializing pure "svgxml". > And for the Cocoon 2.0.x, I don't think it's a good idea. Hmm, why not? Of course not the samples, but only the sitemap entry (as above) and the JAR. Joerg