cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Vadim Gritsenko <>
Subject Re: [proposal] move stuff from scratchpad into the trunk
Date Wed, 28 May 2003 15:02:32 GMT
Christopher Oliver wrote:

> Vadim Gritsenko wrote:


>> First we are creating blocks for more modular design and the next 
>> thing is we are coupling everything back into monolith. I feel that's 
>> not the right way to go.
>> We've got more than 5Mb worth of optional JARs (not counting blocks' 
>> libs) and if you think one of them -- like jxpath -- belongs to the 
>> core than we better poll opinions of all devs here and move it there.
> I think that is a problem whose scope is much broader than 
> VelocityGenerator,


> and I don't think it's appropriate to use that as an excuse for -1-ing 
> the integration of the Velocity generator with the flow layer. For 
> what it's worth, the current flowscript implementation already uses 
> JXPath and Rhino, so no new dependencies are really being introduced 
> by VelocityGenerator. 

Hm. Are you saying that flow is hardwired to JXPath?
/me searching...
Right. That's true.

Ok; I'm +0 then on replacing VelocityGenerator with 
FlowVelocityGenerator, and I propose we move jxpath into the core. 
Unless somebody comes up with a flow without jxpath.


View raw message