cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nicola Ken Barozzi <>
Subject Re: Overloaded pipeline elements (Was Re: [RT] FOM)
Date Wed, 28 May 2003 07:25:03 GMT
Marc Portier wrote, On 28/05/2003 8.38:
> Miles Elam wrote:
>> What is the purpose of resources if this new syntax goes into effect 
>> (which I like by the way)?  What can a resource do that an overloaded 
>> pipeline element cannot?
> I think as Stefano said (slightly rephrased): it would deprecate the use 
> of resources that are only fragments of pipelines.

Then we are basically killing resources, as complete pipelines can 
already be used instead of resources.

> Is this more then an issue of naming this concept? 

I mean, if we make use of resources as callable full or partial sitemap 
snippets, what would we loose that we instead get from using this new 

Nicola Ken Barozzi         
             - verba volant, scripta manent -
    (discussions get forgotten, just code remains)

View raw message