Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 45494 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2003 06:14:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 45481 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2003 06:14:45 -0000 Received: from mail.s-und-n.de (212.8.217.2) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Apr 2003 06:14:45 -0000 Received: from mail.s-und-n.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.s-und-n.de (postfix) with ESMTP id 4870296390 for ; Mon, 7 Apr 2003 08:14:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from notes.sundn.de (ntsrv5.sundn.de [10.10.2.10]) by mail.s-und-n.de (postfix) with ESMTP id 456E88E60C for ; Mon, 7 Apr 2003 08:14:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hw0386 ([10.10.2.59]) by notes.sundn.de (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.8) with SMTP id 2003040708145392:4859 ; Mon, 7 Apr 2003 08:14:53 +0200 From: "Carsten Ziegeler" To: "Cocoon-Dev" Subject: [IMPORTANT] BugZilla Versions Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 08:15:46 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Importance: Normal X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on PBSN1/Systeme und Netzwerke(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 07.04.2003 08:14:54, Serialize by Router on PBSN1/Systeme und Netzwerke(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 07.04.2003 08:14:55, Serialize complete at 07.04.2003 08:14:55 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi, we have now two cvs repositories for 2.x versions, one for 2.0 and one for 2.1; but we have only one module entry in bugzilla. Now, if you want to file a bug, you have to choose the version. Until recently, you could choose between the released versions (2.0, 2.0.1 etc) and "Current CVS". As we now have two "Current CVSs", this is not enough for us. So, I guess we have two possibilities: a) create a second bugzilla module for 2.1 b) create more versions For a quick workaround, I followed b) and changed "Current CVS" to "Current CVS 2.0" and added "Current CVS 2.1". Of course, this might be a little bit confusing. So, what can we do? Carsten Carsten Ziegeler Open Source Group, S&N AG http://radio.weblogs.com/0107211/