Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 69471 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2003 12:05:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 69378 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2003 12:05:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO pulse.betaversion.org) (217.158.110.65) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Apr 2003 12:05:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 11918 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2003 12:05:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO apache.org) (stefano@80.105.91.155) by pulse.betaversion.org with SMTP; 2 Apr 2003 12:05:21 -0000 Message-ID: <3E8AD224.6050803@apache.org> Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 14:05:56 +0200 From: Stefano Mazzocchi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: [ANN] New version of XMLForm released References: <07fc01c2f807$2d009e70$0100a8c0@MAUCHI> <3E895DAD.6050605@apache.org> <0a2f01c2f8cb$79616230$0100a8c0@MAUCHI> <3E8ABFD8.8090207@apache.org> <3E8AD000.8000309@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <3E8AD000.8000309@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > > Stefano Mazzocchi wrote, On 02/04/2003 12.47: > ... > >> But I'm more than happy to see XMLForm being factored out because: >> >> 1) this removes the wrong marketing perception that XMLForm is *the* >> solution for data-logic control. >> >> 2) allows people to experiment different approaches (XForm-based or >> not) with the same level of confidence. >> >> Comments? > > > I held back my comments till now because there was some negative energy > going round, especially because of the way it was "proposed", but IMO > factoring XMLForm out of Cocoon as a library to process XForms makes > perfect techniological sense, both for Cocoon (as you nicely put it) and > for XMLForm, as it would be usable like the Struts Validator is for > example. > > I think though that this can grow into an Apache (sub)project. What > would you suggest in this case? I would suggest to wait and see what happens. Stefano.