Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 79609 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2003 13:10:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 79558 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2003 13:10:24 -0000 Received: from s5.servlets.net (209.221.135.8) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Apr 2003 13:10:24 -0000 Received: from lsbws (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by s5.servlets.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA13683 for ; Thu, 3 Apr 2003 05:10:22 -0800 Message-Id: <200304031310.FAA13683@s5.servlets.net> From: "Robert Koberg" To: Subject: RE: [RT] the quest for the perfect template language Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 05:10:23 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 11.0.4920 In-Reply-To: <91A7AF36-65C5-11D7-BF6E-000393CFE402@codeconsult.ch> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Thread-Index: AcL50ljqLDceXv5LTZWw6cQnfi0OWAAD6x0w X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi, > -----Original Message----- > From: Bertrand Delacretaz [mailto:bdelacretaz@codeconsult.ch] > Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 3:15 AM > Le Jeudi, 3 avr 2003, =E0 12:33 Europe/Zurich, Stefano Mazzocchi a = =E9crit : >=20 > > ...And since the reason why xslt is XML is to allow auto-processing, > > but tell me: how many times did you have to write a stylesheet that > > processed a stylesheet? >=20 > I see your point - I cannot see an advantage today of having XSLT > stylesheets written in XML. I transform XSL to upgrade client's XSL with enhancements I make over = time. Not always easy, but much easier than doing it by hand. Without XSL what would you use? Regexp? -Rob