cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mato Mira, Fernando" <>
Subject RE: [RT] the quest for the perfect template language
Date Thu, 03 Apr 2003 12:10:44 GMT
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stefano Mazzocchi []
> Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 12:12 PM
> To:
> Subject: Re: [RT] the quest for the perfect template language
> Mato Mira, Fernando wrote:
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Stefano Mazzocchi []
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > I agree. The optimum is Lisp.
> > 
> >
> Pfff, changing angle brakets with rounded brakets is not 
> exactly what I 
> call a difference.

Exactly. Why do people complain about Lisp syntax, but are so high on the
SGML-derived languages?

> And considering the adoption of XSLT compared to DSSSL (which used a 
> lisp-based syntax) only the lisp-oriented people would agree 
> with your 
> definition of 'optimality'.

So what? Popularity does not make right.

> And reality tells you that there are 100 C-like-syntax-used 
> persons for 
> each single lisp-like-syntax-used person. So plan to throw your 
> potential user market down the drain.

OK. Current user market does not matter for lispers.

> this is the same exact argument that made us choose 
> javascript instead 
> of scheme for the flowscript syntax. And I think it still holds.

You don't have to choose. The strength of Cocoon is letting the *user*

It's bad enough that I have to bother about the XML monster. I don't plan to
use JSP, XSP, JavaScript
or some custom template language.

You were looking for perfect, not popular, so I had to give it a shot to
accelerating the evolution.

[Before you ask why I don't write a Cocoon in Lisp: well, I'm not paid to do
that; but I can help with
BRL, Scheme flowscript, and other lispy plugins that we might want to use]

View raw message