Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 11123 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2003 10:40:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 11052 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2003 10:40:18 -0000 Received: from vern.chem.tu-berlin.de (130.149.66.116) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Mar 2003 10:40:18 -0000 Received: from vern.chem.tu-berlin.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vern.chem.tu-berlin.de (8.12.3/8.12.3/SuSE Linux 0.6) with ESMTP id h2OAeJgq031817 for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 11:40:19 +0100 Received: from localhost (stephan@localhost) by vern.chem.tu-berlin.de (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) with ESMTP id h2OAeJdS031814 for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 11:40:19 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: vern.chem.tu-berlin.de: stephan owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 11:40:19 +0100 (CET) From: Stephan Michels X-X-Sender: stephan@vern.chem.tu-berlin.de To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: [vote] micro-decision for docs: creation of cocoon-docs CVS module In-Reply-To: <3E7EA64B.30309@outerthought.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Mon, 24 Mar 2003, Steven Noels wrote: > In order to get one little step closer to the 'new' document > infrastructure, many of us seek clarity whether we should move docs to a > separate CVS module or not. The benefits and downfalls are largely > known, so let's vote on this and get this issue cleared. > > My own personal bias: don't forget the different Cocoon _versions_ are > now stored in separate modules, too. > > Please cast your vote: > > [ ] creation of cocoon-docs module > [ X ] docs should stay in src/documentation of the code tree module(s) Stephan.