Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 71930 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2003 09:41:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 71866 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2003 09:41:54 -0000 Received: from mail.s-und-n.de (212.8.217.2) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Mar 2003 09:41:54 -0000 Received: from mail.s-und-n.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.s-und-n.de (postfix) with ESMTP id AAC7C9A9D4 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 10:42:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from notes.sundn.de (ntsrv5.sundn.de [10.10.2.10]) by mail.s-und-n.de (postfix) with ESMTP id 2D2C49A9AE for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 10:42:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from hw0302 ([10.0.1.4]) by notes.sundn.de (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.8) with SMTP id 2003030410420406:15509 ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 10:42:04 +0100 Reply-To: From: "Matthew Langham" To: Subject: RE: Stabilizing flow in order to release Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 10:43:04 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <3E645F29.4030007@apache.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on PBSN1/Systeme und Netzwerke(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 04.03.2003 10:42:04, Serialize by Router on PBSN1/Systeme und Netzwerke(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 04.03.2003 10:42:06, Serialize complete at 04.03.2003 10:42:06 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > > At the same time, Cocoon 2.1-dev has to reach beta state ASAP since we > are nearly feature complete and our internal cleanups and refactoring > are working very well. [in a followup I will outline what's missing > before release] > Just to add slightly to this from my area - there are quite a few large companies using 2.1-dev (and happy with it). However they are having major problems both internally (inside their corporations) and externally (being able to announce publically that they are using Cocoon) because of the fact that 2.1-dev is not at least beta. The longer this takes - the more likely that this could be damaging to commercial adoption of Cocoon. Matthew -- Open Source Group Cocoon { Consulting, Training, Projects } ================================================================= Matthew Langham, S&N AG, Klingenderstrasse 5, D-33100 Paderborn Tel:+49-5251-1581-30 mlangham@s-und-n.de - http://www.s-und-n.de ----------------------------------------------------------------- Cocoon book: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0735712352/needacake-20 Weblogs: http://radio.weblogs.com/0103021/ http://www.oreillynet.com/weblogs/author/1014 =================================================================