Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 12839 invoked by uid 500); 20 Mar 2003 11:15:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 12825 invoked from network); 20 Mar 2003 11:15:39 -0000 Received: from mail.s-und-n.de (212.8.217.2) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Mar 2003 11:15:39 -0000 Received: from mail.s-und-n.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.s-und-n.de (postfix) with ESMTP id 6544BA362C for ; Thu, 20 Mar 2003 12:15:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from notes.sundn.de (ntsrv5.sundn.de [10.10.2.10]) by mail.s-und-n.de (postfix) with ESMTP id E06E0154E5 for ; Thu, 20 Mar 2003 12:15:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from hw0386 ([10.10.2.66]) by notes.sundn.de (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.8) with SMTP id 2003032012155049:19251 ; Thu, 20 Mar 2003 12:15:50 +0100 From: "Carsten Ziegeler" To: Subject: RE: setupPipeline() in AbstractCachingProcessingPipeline Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 12:16:28 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on PBSN1/Systeme und Netzwerke(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 20.03.2003 12:15:50, Serialize by Router on PBSN1/Systeme und Netzwerke(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 20.03.2003 12:15:52, Serialize complete at 20.03.2003 12:15:52 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Stephan Michels wrote: > Hmm, I'll think that I'm not the only one, who went into the trap. You're > right returning a null validity hurts the contract, this will cause an > exception. But a NPE in isValid() doesn't help searching the problem. > Yes, but adding it in add(). Carsten