Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 69738 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2003 17:19:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 69673 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2003 17:19:40 -0000 Received: from nebula.mpn.com (194.72.64.30) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Mar 2003 17:19:40 -0000 Delivered-To: <> Received: from [10.11.155.40] (tashayarr-ext.vnu.co.uk [193.117.79.10]) by nebula.mpn.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA26666 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 17:19:43 GMT User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.1.2418 Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2003 17:21:47 +0000 Subject: Re: Jetty performance.... From: Pier Fumagalli To: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <40751.10.0.0.1.1047055699.squirrel@ags01.agsoftware.dnsalias.com> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N "Antonio Gallardo" wrote: > Hi Luca! > > I seems like nobody is interested in this topic. I cannot believe it! :-( Well, it's not really related to Cocoon... Cocoon ships with Jetty for its "build run" environment, nothing that I would run on a production (or even development server). > The question is: > What we gain if the applications run slow under Jetty?. That's your measurement... I've noticed a quite substantial performance increase... > The only positive answer is that we "save" some cents in storage on the > hard disk, but since it is too cheap.... I think our saving are less than > 1 cents or low. :-D You're more than welcome to go and download Tomcat, and install the cocoon web-application onto it. I believe, though, it would be a _huge_ mistake if we thought about adding another 24 megs of code just to ship a servlet container with the Cocoon distribution... That's my thought, at least... Pier