Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 50236 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2003 18:01:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 50112 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2003 18:01:42 -0000 Received: from fep02.tuttopmi.it (HELO fep02-svc.flexmail.it) (212.131.248.101) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Mar 2003 18:01:42 -0000 Received: from apache.org ([80.204.154.190]) by fep02-svc.flexmail.it (InterMail vM.5.01.05.09 201-253-122-126-109-20020611) with ESMTP id <20030325180203.LUX26848.fep02-svc.flexmail.it@apache.org> for ; Tue, 25 Mar 2003 19:02:03 +0100 Message-ID: <3E809972.2080001@apache.org> Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 19:01:22 +0100 From: Nicola Ken Barozzi Reply-To: nicolaken@apache.org Organization: Apache Software Foundation User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: treeprocessor question References: <3E80748E.2070409@apache.org> <3E8082D8.80704@anyware-tech.com> In-Reply-To: <3E8082D8.80704@anyware-tech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Sylvain Wallez wrote, On 25/03/2003 17.24: ... > Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > >> is error-handling inherited? > > Yes ... >> if so, are there any drawbacks? > > Drawbacks ? No that I'm aware of... ;-) AFAIK and from use cases I've seen it's a welcome feature; it's quite common to keep it only in the main sitemap and redefine it in special cases. -- Nicola Ken Barozzi nicolaken@apache.org - verba volant, scripta manent - (discussions get forgotten, just code remains) ---------------------------------------------------------------------