Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 45847 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2003 13:22:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 45832 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2003 13:22:53 -0000 Received: from fep01.tuttopmi.it (HELO fep01-svc.flexmail.it) (212.131.248.100) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Mar 2003 13:22:53 -0000 Received: from apache.org ([80.204.154.190]) by fep01-svc.flexmail.it (InterMail vM.5.01.05.09 201-253-122-126-109-20020611) with ESMTP id <20030324132254.PYHU22033.fep01-svc.flexmail.it@apache.org> for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 14:22:54 +0100 Message-ID: <3E7F0692.2090304@apache.org> Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 14:22:26 +0100 From: Nicola Ken Barozzi Reply-To: nicolaken@apache.org Organization: Apache Software Foundation User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: [proposal] a new kind of 'dist' References: <3E7DC3CD.4090007@apache.org> <3E7EC8C2.5040409@anyware-tech.com> <3E7EE3A9.2050409@apache.org> <3E7EE53B.6040001@apache.org> <3E7EEA42.4090801@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <3E7EEA42.4090801@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Stefano Mazzocchi wrote, On 24/03/2003 12.21: > Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: ... >> I'm sure that if we don't give our users a sample precompiled version >> it will have a really negative impact on the alpha-view of Cocoon and >> stop many from checking it out, whatever technical motive you may have. > > I *strongly* disagree. Why may I ask? When I browse project on SF based on web stuff, if I find a precompiled jar I shove it in Tomcat and test it. If not, I usually pass by. AFAIK many do so, and when I tell the ones I know to get the source cocoon distro, they start to whine and don't do it. This is what I see, my small part of the world, so take it as MHO based on what I see, nothing else. >> It's not a technical point, if it were only so we would be doing >> releases by just tagging CVS probably. > > I don't like your tone. I think you are misunderstanding my tone (and honestly I don't understand why you don't like it). I really think that CVS should be the only way of getting source distros, and with SVN it will be easier (WebDAV access). The developers should all see the same thing, and VCS is the only way of having consistent views. If a dev needs to send a patch, he doesn't have to download other stuff for example. -- Nicola Ken Barozzi nicolaken@apache.org - verba volant, scripta manent - (discussions get forgotten, just code remains) ---------------------------------------------------------------------