Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 28037 invoked by uid 500); 21 Mar 2003 14:06:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 28021 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2003 14:06:22 -0000 Received: from out001pub.verizon.net (HELO out001.verizon.net) (206.46.170.140) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Mar 2003 14:06:22 -0000 Received: from verizon.net ([139.85.116.194]) by out001.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.05.27 201-253-122-126-127-20021220) with ESMTP id <20030321140623.HRUI5518.out001.verizon.net@verizon.net> for ; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 08:06:23 -0600 Message-ID: <3E7B1C5D.5050904@verizon.net> Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 09:06:21 -0500 From: Vadim Gritsenko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: Cocoon Gump Status References: <3E7B19D4.50807@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <3E7B19D4.50807@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out001.verizon.net from [139.85.116.194] at Fri, 21 Mar 2003 08:06:23 -0600 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > It seems that we are converging toward a stable gump setup. This is > very nice and very useful to help us solidify our contracts and make > it visible for other projects underneath our food chain to watch us. > > Currently, 6 blocks fail. I'm listing the problems > the really broken ones are: > > - fop Latest FOP release is fop-0.20.5rc2 coming from the maintainance branch. This release still has org.apache.fop.apps.Options class. But in CVS head it was removed (in favor of something better, I presume. AFAIK fop is moving towards Avalon). As we recenlty agreed, Cocoon should base on the released stuff. Thus, I don't see how GUMP could be fixed. Vadim