Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 90140 invoked by uid 500); 21 Mar 2003 08:55:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 90127 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2003 08:55:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.dff.local) (62.159.19.130) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Mar 2003 08:55:49 -0000 Received: from altair.dff.local ([172.16.2.8] helo=dff.st) by mail.dff.local with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 18wIJl-0006Oq-00 for cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 09:56:01 +0100 Message-ID: <3E7AD3E9.6090103@dff.st> Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 09:57:13 +0100 From: Torsten Curdt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030210 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: database block not jvm depended anymore References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > Great! Thanks! > > Just one question: > > But we currently have the dependency to the split excalibur datasource > package. So we can't remove the dependency from the build system > right now, right? As you say: that one is excalibur related. But Berin already fixed that one [1] But AFAIK it's not yet even checked in and thereby far away from being relased. IIRC we wanted to go with release versions only - right? A very big temptation though :-/ [1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=104687548629312&w=2 cheers -- Torsten