Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 74360 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2003 17:28:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 74323 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2003 17:28:32 -0000 Received: from out003pub.verizon.net (HELO out003.verizon.net) (206.46.170.103) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2003 17:28:32 -0000 Received: from verizon.net ([4.47.133.0]) by out003.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.05.27 201-253-122-126-127-20021220) with ESMTP id <20030311172834.BYEC3697.out003.verizon.net@verizon.net> for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 11:28:34 -0600 Message-ID: <3E6E1CC3.6040609@verizon.net> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 09:28:35 -0800 From: Christopher Oliver Reply-To: coliver@apache.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: Eclipse javac is screwed? References: <3E6DF573.5040704@verizon.net> <3E6E18C0.6060804@verizon.net> <3E6E1998.5040105@verizon.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out003.verizon.net from [4.47.133.0] at Tue, 11 Mar 2003 11:28:34 -0600 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > Christopher Oliver wrote: > >> Hi Vadim, >> >> The EclipseJavaCompiler is currently hardcoded with source=1.4 and >> target=1.4. This is because I didn't know how to configure those >> properties through the available Cocoon interfaces. There is nothing >> wrong with the Eclipse compiler itself, only with my code. Either we >> can hardcode it with source=1.3 target=1.3 in which case it will work >> under jdk1.3.1 or we need to make it configurable. > > > > Ok, now it detects this automatically. Is it ok for you? > > Vadim OK. But, I think you should also set the source version. What do you think?