Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 61799 invoked by uid 500); 20 Mar 2003 18:43:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 61682 invoked from network); 20 Mar 2003 18:43:11 -0000 Received: from purveyor9.dresdnerbank.de (193.194.7.169) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Mar 2003 18:43:11 -0000 Received: from ffzj0yga.dresdner.net (unverified) by purveyor9.dresdnerbank.de (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.2.5) with ESMTP id for ; Thu, 20 Mar 2003 19:43:14 +0100 Received: from fztig938.bank.dresdner.net (fztig938.bank.dresdner.net [130.63.80.51]) by ffzj0yga.dresdner.net (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA01607 for ; Thu, 20 Mar 2003 19:43:14 +0100 (MET) Posted-Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 19:43:14 +0100 (MET) Received: from crafterm by fztig938.bank.dresdner.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18w50T-0001O0-00 for ; Thu, 20 Mar 2003 19:43:13 +0100 Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 19:43:13 +0100 To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: Flow Scoping, was: JavaScriptInterpreter: bug or feature? Message-ID: <20030320184313.GB5291@fztig938.bank.dresdner.net> Reply-To: crafterm@managesoft.com References: <3E793381.6040703@verizon.net> <3E7939EF.9080102@verizon.net> <3E794717.8040305@verizon.net> <20030320173715.GA4155@fztig938.bank.dresdner.net> <3E79FDAA.4050402@verizon.net> <20030320180217.GC4155@fztig938.bank.dresdner.net> <3E7A08D2.3090201@verizon.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3E7A08D2.3090201@verizon.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i From: Marcus Crafter X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 01:30:42PM -0500, Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > Marcus Crafter wrote: > > > > For systems where a subsitemap represents a new application, > > behaviour would be configured to be as it currently is. > > Why not: for systems where a subsitemap represents a new app, dont > declare anything in the parent sitemap you don't want to expose to > subsitemap! :-) > > This will be consistent with the rest of Cocoon - otherwise somebody > will ask for sitemap which does not inherits, say, generators... Good point. :) Cheers, Marcus -- ..... ,,$$$$$$$$$, Marcus Crafter ;$' '$$$$: Computer Systems Engineer $: $$$$: ManageSoft GmbH $ o_)$$$: 82-84 Mainzer Landstrasse ;$, _/\ &&:' 60327 Frankfurt Germany ' /( &&& \_&&&&' &&&&. &&&&&&&: