Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 81721 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2003 13:55:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 81702 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2003 13:55:43 -0000 Received: from exchange.sun.com (192.18.33.10) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Mar 2003 13:55:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 8935 invoked by uid 50); 15 Mar 2003 13:57:26 -0000 Date: 15 Mar 2003 13:57:26 -0000 Message-ID: <20030315135726.8934.qmail@nagoya.betaversion.org> From: bugzilla@apache.org To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Cc: Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17930] - [PATCH] update on FOP serializer docs X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17930 [PATCH] update on FOP serializer docs joerg.heinicke@gmx.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | ------- Additional Comments From joerg.heinicke@gmx.de 2003-03-15 13:57 ------- isn't it valid fro cocoon-2.0 too (without "relative to the sitemap directory")? so shouldn't be the docs updated there too?