From cocoon-dev-return-37649-apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive=xml.apache.org@xml.apache.org Tue Mar 04 11:09:11 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 11400 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2003 11:09:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 11351 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2003 11:09:06 -0000 Received: from vamana-60.cablenet.com.ni (HELO ags01.agsoftware.dnsalias.com) (216.6.48.60) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Mar 2003 11:09:06 -0000 Received: from ags01.agsoftware.dnsalias.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ags01.agsoftware.dnsalias.com (8.12.8/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h24BABLx019559 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 05:10:11 -0600 Received: (from apache@localhost) by ags01.agsoftware.dnsalias.com (8.12.8/8.12.5/Submit) id h24BABZK019557; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 05:10:11 -0600 X-Authentication-Warning: ags01.agsoftware.dnsalias.com: apache set sender to agallardo@agsoftware.dnsalias.com using -f Received: from 10.0.0.1 (SquirrelMail authenticated user agallardo) by ags01.agsoftware.dnsalias.com with HTTP; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 05:10:11 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <35854.10.0.0.1.1046776211.squirrel@ags01.agsoftware.dnsalias.com> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 05:10:11 -0600 (CST) Subject: Re: Flow Layer Database API From: "Antonio Gallardo" To: In-Reply-To: <82A5AA9C-4E30-11D7-90DA-0003935AD2EE@media.demon.co.uk> References: <3E63EADA.6090700@verizon.net> <82A5AA9C-4E30-11D7-90DA-0003935AD2EE@media.demon.co.uk> X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.2.11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > On a personal note, it is unfortunate because I think your new > techniques will be more attractive to my Client! Even though it may not > be the best way to work, they will find it easier to understand, being > closer to what they used to do. So even though I might prefer O-R > Mapping, I don't think they will. I think O/R Mapping at the first sight looks a doom. But when I closer see it. It is the same stuff we do when we write modular Database Actions. The database.xml is a real O/R mapping without Beans. Antonio Gallardo.