cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Savory <>
Subject Re: [RT] Cocoon's own publishing system
Date Tue, 11 Mar 2003 16:31:58 GMT
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:

> Diana Shannon wrote:
> > 1. Many, many committers weren't updating release and head branches with
> > their doc updates. It took time to scrutinize differences in the
> > branches, to make sure all relevant docs were in the release branch,
> > which is what is used to generate the web site.
> Agreed this is a problem.
> Hopefully, now that we have two clearly separated repositories, people
> will document only in the appropriate one.


I really don't think we want two sets of documentation, do we? It leads to
unnecessary discrepancies, continuity issues and duplication of effort.
There is no reason that I am aware of that we couldn't have one single set
of documentation, and mark content where appropriate as "2.0 only" or "2.1
only". I'm sure that a cocoon-doc cvs module is the right way to go.

Other than that, the rest of the idea for the publishing system sounds
pretty good.


Andrew Savory                                Email:
Managing Director                              Tel:  +44 (0)870 741 6658
Luminas Internet Applications                  Fax:  +44 (0)700 598 1135
This is not an official statement or order.    Web:

View raw message