cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stephan Michels <step...@apache.org>
Subject Re: cvs commit: cocoon-2.1 status.xml todo.xml
Date Tue, 25 Mar 2003 09:50:53 GMT


On Mon, 24 Mar 2003, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:

> crossley@apache.org wrote:
> > crossley    2003/03/22 23:17:16
> >
> >   Modified:    .        status.xml todo.xml
> >   Log:
> >   Note about the excellent old functionality to check-jars.
> >
> >   Revision  Changes    Path
> >   1.2       +5 -0      cocoon-2.1/status.xml
> >
> >   Index: status.xml
> >   ===================================================================
> >   RCS file: /home/cvs/cocoon-2.1/status.xml,v
> >   retrieving revision 1.1
> >   retrieving revision 1.2
> >   diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
> >   --- status.xml	21 Mar 2003 13:56:07 -0000	1.1
> >   +++ status.xml	23 Mar 2003 07:17:15 -0000	1.2
> >   @@ -106,6 +106,11 @@
> >          <link href="plan/samples.html">refactoring of samples</link>
> >        </action>
> >
> >   +    <action context="build" assigned-to="open">
> >   +      Bring back the check-jars functionality. This verified that all jars
> >   +      were properly described. It was lost the the recent build re-factoring.
> >   +    </action>
> >   +
> >        <action context="code" assigned-to="open">
> >          Move complete Source implementation to Excalibur.
> >        </action>
>
> why do we have both todo.xml/changes.xml *and* status.xml?

Correct me if I'm wrong. The Forrest project consumes the status.xml file,
and the docs target the todo.xml and changes.xml files. Since we have
decided that we using Forrest for the docs, todo.xml and changes.xml will
be obsolete.

Stephan


Mime
View raw message