cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Pier Fumagalli <p...@betaversion.org>
Subject Re: Polishing the flow contracts
Date Sun, 30 Mar 2003 22:23:34 GMT
On 30/3/03 14:43, "Stefano Mazzocchi" <stefano@apache.org> wrote:

> Cocoon Object:
> [...]
>    cocoon.process(uri, dict, output

There's another thing I don't really like (and being the implementor of the
feature, yes, it's my own fault)...

Currently to the "process" method we ought to pass a nice OutputStream
instance, which we can create using the Rhino extensions to acess Java
objects.

Now, I'd rather like to see it more "factored" out, a some sort of
"OutputStreamFactory", like we do for source files...

Anyone has some design hints on how we could achieve that? Anyone else sees
it as I do as a "design hack" ???

    Pier (the culprit)



Mime
View raw message