cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Pier Fumagalli <p...@betaversion.org>
Subject Re: tallying [Re: [vote] micro-decision for docs: creation of cocoon-docs CVS module]
Date Mon, 24 Mar 2003 20:30:48 GMT
On 24/3/03 7:38 pm, "Steven Noels" <stevenn@outerthought.org> wrote:

> (follow up to cocoon-docs please)
> 
> On 24/03/2003 7:31 Steven Noels wrote:
> 
>> In order to get one little step closer to the 'new' document
>> infrastructure, many of us seek clarity whether we should move docs to a
>> separate CVS module or not. The benefits and downfalls are largely
>> known, so let's vote on this and get this issue cleared.
>> 
>> My own personal bias: don't forget the different Cocoon _versions_ are
>> now stored in separate modules, too.
>> 
>> Please cast your vote:
> 
> results so far:
> 
> [  ]  creation of cocoon-docs module: morrijr, shannon, stefano,
> bdelacretaz
>       not sure because of comments: sylvain
>       not sure because of 0.x vote: haul
>       not eligible but almost a committer: andrew
> 
> [  ]  docs should stay in src/documentation of the code tree
> module(s): jefft, nicolaken, pier, stephan
> 
> ... which means we could use some more votes do establish genuine
> consensus...!

Steven... I didn't say that the documentation should reside in the
src/documentation... I lean (on the other hand) quite on the other side of
the fence, because I know that if someone wants to have those docs in
src/documentation, we can make this happen easily like the HTTP project does
with its documentation... :-)

    Pier


Mime
View raw message