cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Pier Fumagalli <p...@betaversion.org>
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL] Continuation in objectModel, Was: Discussion of Flow Issues
Date Mon, 17 Mar 2003 02:56:55 GMT
On 17/3/03 2:45, "Christopher Oliver" <res1cf5x@verizon.net> wrote:

>> This raises a question... Do we want to keep the IDL sources in line with
>> what's in the implementation (as it is right now) or do we want to work on
>> an abstract model in IDL and then implement it?
>> 
>> Maybe it would be a good idea to move everything as of the current
>> implementation in a "cocoon.flow.javascript" module, keep that in sync with
>> the implementation, hack around the "cocoon.flow" module, leaning towards a
>> good design, and make those two models converge.
>> 
>> How does it sound? Ideas?
> 
> Agree. I wrote the original IDL to reflect exactly what was in CVS. We
> should move that somewhere else and start designing the proper interfaces.

Will do that tomorrow (now that daddy's gone back home!)... Better to get
some sleep now before I forget that Cocoon is written in Java... :-)

    Pier


Mime
View raw message