cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefano Mazzocchi <stef...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Polishing the flow contracts
Date Sun, 30 Mar 2003 19:32:03 GMT
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
> On 30/3/03 2:43 pm, "Stefano Mazzocchi" <stefano@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> 
>>Here is what I would like to see:
>>
>>1) no functions without an object namespace. This is to imply that all
>>non-prefixed functions belong to the flow. Provides coherent cognitive
>>context.
> 
> 
> I don't understand that.... What do you mean by "function with(out) object
> namespace?

I mean functions without an object up front.

info() <- bad
log.info() <- good

>>4) the following functions
>>
>>Flow Object:
>>   flow.import() -> imports another flowscript
> 
> 
> Hmmm... Should we allow cross-language (when/if we're going to have it)
> flowscripts interaction? Because otherwise I'd prefer a name such as
> "interpreter"....

I don't get it. What's wrong with the name flow?

>>Cocoon Object:
>>   cocoon.sendPage(uri, dict) -> sends a pipeline to the client
>>
>>   cocoon.sendPageAndWait(uri, dict) -> sends a pipeline to the client
>>and save the continuation.
>>
>>   cocoon.process(uri, dict, output
> 
> 
> Stefano... This one was cut as well... Can you please forward the rest????

Oh, #$&*! No, i can't, that message wasn't stored in my sent folder :/

grrrr

I hate these things.

Stefano.


Mime
View raw message