cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefano Mazzocchi <stef...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [ANN] XMLForm as a standalone servlet toolkit
Date Fri, 28 Mar 2003 10:25:00 GMT
Kevin O'Neill wrote:

> I don't believe that points 4 and 5 are violated by "package
> org.apache.xmlform" any more than the statement "import
> org.apache.xmlform"; the license precludes neither one of these things.

There is a huge difference between

  package org.apache.xmlform;

and

  import org.apache.xmlform.*;

and the reason is that the first is a describer, the second is a reference.

If you describe your stuff with a name or trademark or sign that is 
owned by somebody else and it can be shown that you do *harm* to the 
trademark owner when you do, you can get sued for damages.

If you reference an entity with its name, this is fair use and cannot 
cause any harm if properly placed in context.

The reason why 'package org.apache...' can harm the foundation is, for 
example, name clashing. A package name is a unique identifier for a 
class, if there is a package name collision in the classloader, it is 
impossible to reference one class from another.

So, if apache decides to use the org.apache.whatever package and 
somebody else used it already, there is potential harm.

The policy of protecting the package name is to avoid further problems 
down the road.

But defining an package and import it (or extend it) are two entirely 
different things because they can't do any harm.

Stefano.


Mime
View raw message