cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Steven Noels <>
Subject Re: tallying [Re: [vote] micro-decision for docs: creation of cocoon-docs CVS module]
Date Thu, 27 Mar 2003 13:31:14 GMT
On 27/03/2003 14:16 Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> Le Jeudi, 27 mars 2003, à 13:52 Europe/Zurich, Diana Shannon a écrit :
>> ...
>> I think a discussion intermixed with a vote changes the vote so that 
>> people end up voting on different issues -- with no clear cut result.
> Agreed - in this particular case, the best thing might be to cancel the 
> current vote and make a new proposal (taking into account the 
> "cocoon-docs alias" stuff)?
> This would make sure everyone's on the same wavelength before voting.
> Steven, you started the original vote, what do you think?

It's good to see that the 'requirement' to vote adds some energy to the 
discussion, but then again, you, Diana & David are mostly right when 
suggesting that vote was premature and underspecified. I'm the hero of 
underspecification, but keep that silent. :-D

Personally, I find it difficult to follow the current discussion, so if 
somebody would be able to summarize (as a proposal), this will help (at 
least stupid me ;-)


Steven Noels                  
Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center
Read my weblog at  
stevenn at                stevenn at

View raw message