cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefano Mazzocchi <>
Subject Re: cvs disruption
Date Sun, 23 Mar 2003 13:20:12 GMT
Diana Shannon wrote:

>>> All right. Since there is circular dependency between cocoon and
>>> forrest, I would suggest we release cocoon 2.1 first, allow forrest to
>>> release a new version based on 2.1 and at that point forrestize our 
>>> docs.
>>> how does that sound?
>> But this circular dependency will always be there, so why not
>> just get on with it. Anyway, Forrest uses a recent stable
>> version of cocoon-2.1-dev, i.e. just off the bleeding-edge.
> I agree we should get on with it too, as long as we don't break existing 
> doc build capability. I think we should rely on the cvs version only for 
> this transition stage. In the future, I don't want the docs build 
> dependent on a cvs which from time to time will break. While the 
> responsiveness of Forrest committers is incredible, I think Stefano's 
> principle stated above is a best practice we should follow, especially 
> for something like doc building (given the fact users just want docs, 
> not necessarily the latest-greatest code which produces such docs).

All right, I think we need a vote on this. Please see next email.


View raw message