cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefano Mazzocchi <>
Subject Re: [RT] Flow as a block
Date Wed, 19 Mar 2003 13:48:34 GMT
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
> Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>> Sylvain Wallez wrote:
>>> But won't work :-(
>> :)
>>> Why ? Well, yes, a sitemap element = a builder class. But the
>>> configuration file that defines them is used to feed a
>>> ComponentSelector, which will try to load the class and the result is
>>> that you will get an Exception in the initialization phase of the
>>> TreeProcessor...
>>> The only viable solution is for the declaration to be _not present_ in
>>> the treeprocessor configuration.
>> This is not the best solution, as it would required to change the
>> treeprocessor conf for adding/removing flow.
>> Could the treeprocessor check the availability of a class before feeding
>> it into the selector? If the class is not available, a dummy 
>> implementation
>> could be perhaps added that could - when used - throw a meaningfull
>> exception.
> Well, this would mean rewriting a ComponenentSelector specifically for 
> this purpose, since the TreeProcessor does nothing more than delegating 
> all this stuff to a CS : see DefaultTreeBuilder.createBuilderSelector().
> Mmmh... A good solution may be to have a FakeFlowNodeBuilder that 
> delegates to a RealFlowNodeBuilder if it's present in the classpath, and 
> otherwise fails with a nice error message saying that the flow isn't 
> installed.
> That way, we don't have to open wide the sitemap language definition, 
> which could lead to abuses : map:flow becomes an optional element that 
> is however pre-configured in the sitemap definition. Just drop in the 
> flow jar and it becomes available, without touching a single 
> configuration file.
> Thoughts ?

I personally don't like it. Adding fake facades for just one thing 
doesn't sound right at all.

I think that Carsten's problem is to have an external dependency on the 
rhino jar. Please, Carsten, correct me if I'm wrong.

Now, if my sitemap doesn't use *any* flow elements, would the jar need 
to be in the classloader?


View raw message