cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nicola Ken Barozzi <nicola...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [RT] Flow as a block
Date Sat, 15 Mar 2003 09:37:30 GMT

Niclas Hedhman wrote, On 15/03/2003 9.25:
> On Friday 14 March 2003 22:01, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> 
>>Stefano Mazzocchi wrote, On 14/03/2003 14.49:
>>
>>>But I would like to be able to build cocoon without them and prevent
>>>people with the ability to use them to solve their problems. Just like
>>>Carsten wants to do with the flow or XSP.
>>
>>That's not the reason IIUC.
>>Flow adds new dependencies to Cocoon as jars, actions do not. What is
>>the technical reason why actions have to be able to be removed?
>>
>>If you don't want to use them, don't. Since people will be able to
>>compile with the support in, they will do so, and you will not prevent
>>them to use actions (nor ATM it's desireable).
> 
> Well, if you become a Cocoon hosting service, you may have a different opinion 
> of what other people can do in their sitemaps.

Good point... if only removing actions would be a solution. If I were a 
Cocoon hosting service, I would want complete control on all the 
components that users can use, but that has nothing to do with Actions 
per se IIUC, but about the implementations of Cocoon components and the 
possibility of using them.

Any suggestion on what you would want to have to create your costomized 
version of Cocoon given the above point?

-- 
Nicola Ken Barozzi                   nicolaken@apache.org
             - verba volant, scripta manent -
    (discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------


Mime
View raw message