cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Steven Noels <stev...@outerthought.org>
Subject Re: validation of config during build (Was: Re: sitemap validation is broken)
Date Sat, 08 Mar 2003 08:12:50 GMT
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> Steven Noels wrote:


>> Looking at the history of sitemap-v06.rng, I can't see this has been 
>> happening a lot. Quite contrarily, some (myself included) have been 
>> advocating to relax it even further. But dropping it will effectively 
>> kill the small circle of people interested in maintaining such a thing.
>>
>> Reasonable?
> 
> 
> <read my lips> I AM NOT SUGGESTING TO DROP THE SCHEMA!!! </read my lips>
> 
> is that clear enough? should I repeat it?
> 
> I'm suggesting to remove the validation target from the build system and 
> improve the way treeprocessor handles errors.
> 
> As I said, i don't care *how* this is done, as long as the error 
> messages that users receive are much more meaningful than those silly 
> "System ID no found" when an attribute name is wrong.

I'm going to be stubborn about this: _if_ we drop the target (I was 
already aware of you not pushing to drop the schema, no problem here), 
then the few people who care about the schema won't be warned about 
required changes anymore.

I don't see any relation between the grammar, where and when it should 
be used, and the lack of exception handling code in the tree processor.

But since we are the only one who care to continue this thread, let's 
drop it. I'm going to check what Sylvain has to say about it.

Cheers,

</Steven>
-- 
Steven Noels                            http://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center
Read my weblog at            http://blogs.cocoondev.org/stevenn/
stevenn at outerthought.org                stevenn at apache.org


Mime
View raw message