cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Niclas Hedhman <nic...@internuscorp.com>
Subject Re: [RT] Flow as a block
Date Sat, 15 Mar 2003 08:25:53 GMT
On Friday 14 March 2003 22:01, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> Stefano Mazzocchi wrote, On 14/03/2003 14.49:
> > But I would like to be able to build cocoon without them and prevent
> > people with the ability to use them to solve their problems. Just like
> > Carsten wants to do with the flow or XSP.
>
> That's not the reason IIUC.
> Flow adds new dependencies to Cocoon as jars, actions do not. What is
> the technical reason why actions have to be able to be removed?
>
> If you don't want to use them, don't. Since people will be able to
> compile with the support in, they will do so, and you will not prevent
> them to use actions (nor ATM it's desireable).

Well, if you become a Cocoon hosting service, you may have a different opinion 
of what other people can do in their sitemaps.

Niclas

Mime
View raw message