cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "J.D. Daniels" ...@datatrio.com>
Subject Re: [rant] Re: [vote] micro-decision for docs: creation ofcocoon-docs CVS module
Date Mon, 24 Mar 2003 21:09:01 GMT
Actually... I dont httpd is a fiar example. There is a reason for that...
there is not many modules that function correctly under 2.0... we are only
waiting for them to catch up :D at my last count, there are 4 that i use
that dont work. (Among them mod_jk)

By itself, 2.0 kicks butt... but i can't use it in production yet :(

JD

----- Original Message -----
From: "Pier Fumagalli" <pier@betaversion.org>
To: <cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 12:04 PM
Subject: Re: [rant] Re: [vote] micro-decision for docs: creation
ofcocoon-docs CVS module


> On 24/3/03 3:09 pm, "Stefano Mazzocchi" <stefano@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Anyway, we can't force people to do anything: if they won't migrate from
> > 2.0, we have failed and we should start reconsidering our architectural
> > strategies because our user base is not following us.
>
> Hmm.. I don't think you're right on this, Stefano... Look at HTTPd, still
a
> lot of people are using 1.3, when 2.0 is delivering (for example) _A_LOT_
> more performance than the old tree...
>
> Still, a huge part of the user base didn't "switch" just yet...
>
>     Pier
>


Mime
View raw message