Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 93254 invoked by uid 500); 27 Feb 2003 13:30:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 93188 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2003 13:30:35 -0000 Received: from mail.s-und-n.de (212.8.217.2) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Feb 2003 13:30:35 -0000 Received: from mail.s-und-n.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.s-und-n.de (postfix) with ESMTP id 23F049D660 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 14:30:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from notes.sundn.de (ntsrv5.sundn.de [10.10.2.10]) by mail.s-und-n.de (postfix) with ESMTP id A674A8C126 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 14:30:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from hw0386 ([10.10.2.65]) by notes.sundn.de (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.8) with SMTP id 2003022714303280:7870 ; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 14:30:32 +0100 From: "Carsten Ziegeler" To: "Cocoon-Dev" Subject: [VOTE] New CVS Repository Names (was: [PROPOSAL] New CVS Repository Names ) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 14:30:57 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Importance: Normal X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on PBSN1/Systeme und Netzwerke(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 27.02.2003 14:30:33, Serialize by Router on PBSN1/Systeme und Netzwerke(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 27.02.2003 14:30:33, Serialize complete at 27.02.2003 14:30:33 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N So, now we all (at least those participating) have the same understanding and we can start a vote: A cocoon version is defined as MAJOR.MINOR.PATCHLEVEL - One repository for each MAJOR.MINOR combination - Inside a repository are all patch levels. Each one tagged, but there wont be any branching On a release of a MAJOR.MINOR version we create a new repository. This will lead us to currently: cocoon-2.0 and cocoon-2.1 and cocoon-1 (for the old xml-cocoon repo). In addition we will have cocoon-2-historic as a simple copy to the current xml-cocoon2 repo. In addition we will have a symlink (right?) "cocoon" that links to the latest version, so currently this will be cocoon-2.1. I hope I have summarized this correctly. If so, please cast your votes. PS: If we voted for it, we have to set a date for the change, because we also have to update our website and inform users. Carsten Carsten Ziegeler Open Source Group, S&N AG