Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 6550 invoked by uid 500); 26 Feb 2003 15:36:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 6488 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2003 15:36:08 -0000 Received: from mail.s-und-n.de (212.8.217.2) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Feb 2003 15:36:08 -0000 Received: from mail.s-und-n.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.s-und-n.de (postfix) with ESMTP id 95C4B9E33A for ; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 16:36:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from notes.sundn.de (ntsrv5.sundn.de [10.10.2.10]) by mail.s-und-n.de (postfix) with ESMTP id 1635C9E326 for ; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 16:36:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from hw0386 ([10.10.2.65]) by notes.sundn.de (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.8) with SMTP id 2003022616360787:5444 ; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 16:36:07 +0100 From: "Carsten Ziegeler" To: Subject: RE: cvs commit: xml-cocoon2 build.xml Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 16:36:30 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 In-Reply-To: <3E5CDD6F.7070207@apache.org> Importance: Normal X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on PBSN1/Systeme und Netzwerke(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 26.02.2003 16:36:08, Serialize by Router on PBSN1/Systeme und Netzwerke(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 26.02.2003 16:36:09, Serialize complete at 26.02.2003 16:36:09 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > what about three different clean targets? > > 1) clean same vm -> clean > 2) clean different vm -> ??? > 3) clean everything -> distclean > > what do you think? > Ehm, I was a little bit too quick perhaps :) - ok, the only real problem are our own ant tasks - I changed the build, so they are now build for a 1.2 jdk. So even if you build them with 1.4 you can use them with 1.2 now. I think this is the best solution - it keeps everything clear and a little bit faster. Carsten