Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 40073 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2003 22:51:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 40004 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2003 22:51:56 -0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.1.2418 Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 22:52:00 +0000 Subject: Re: [proposal] aiming to a naked cocoon From: Pier Fumagalli To: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <3E496BE9.2010408@apache.org> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 11/2/03 21:32, "Stefano Mazzocchi" wrote: > - Deli +1, it relies on the assumption that certain things are in "WEB-INF" so, I don't want to see it in there! :-) > and so on and each block will have its own build file (not the current > build system generated by an XSLT stylesheet) I like this! :-) The less-trivial part was to figure out how HttpProxy could have been built if I didn't write a build.xml! :-) > This will make it easier to migrate the blocks when a better component > architecture will be in place after we release cocoon 2.1 Agreed on all points... Pier --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org