Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 76380 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2003 23:09:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 76346 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2003 23:09:28 -0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.1.2418 Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 23:09:30 +0000 Subject: Re: WSProxyGenerator From: Pier Fumagalli To: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20030210155933.U3879-100000@neuagency.com> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 10/2/03 21:00, "Tony Collen" wrote: > On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Nathaniel Alfred wrote: > >> Why not use plain old FileGenerator? At least with 2.1's URLSource >> > >> >> >> works like a charm. Am I missing something? > > The WSP also passes any POST or GET parameters to the remote host, which > is something the FileGenerator does not do. Would it just make sense to > put this feature into the FileGenerator as a ? Ok, in my working copy (which I deleted this afternoon, promptly followed by swearing in my native language going on for roughly 4 hours), the proxy generator was configured in the following way: http://wwwp.overture.com/d/search/p/partner/xml/2.3.2/ POST valueB2 valueB3 valueY1 valueY2 [...] I was planning to add support for headers as well, but at the end, I have to rewrite the entire thing by tomorrow in the morning, so, those will come later :-( Pier --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org