Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 10751 invoked by uid 500); 27 Feb 2003 06:19:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 10738 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2003 06:19:30 -0000 Received: from sccrmhc03.attbi.com (204.127.202.63) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Feb 2003 06:19:30 -0000 Received: from apache.org (12-234-84-6.client.attbi.com[12.234.84.6]) by sccrmhc03.attbi.com (sccrmhc03) with SMTP id <20030227061940003009ud83e>; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 06:19:40 +0000 Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 22:19:41 -0800 Subject: Re: That's it Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v551) From: Ovidiu Predescu To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <3E5CDCC6.9010805@hisitech.com> Message-Id: <74A7C5A0-4A1B-11D7-8864-00039398D61E@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.551) X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Wednesday, Feb 26, 2003, at 07:27 US/Pacific, Santiago Gala wrote: > Matthew Langham wrote: > (...) > >> reducing our role. But I feel that if you are a committer - you should >> commit. And this is something I will not be able to do in the near >> future. >> Not in the original sense anyway. > > Reading, watching and answering emails is "committing" knowledge to > the project repository. Think of the message-ids of your mails like > "versions" ;-) > > Also, consolidating documentation is, IMO, refactoring knowledge, and > bringing fresh "customer" views to the team also. Even "evangelizing" > or training, although the metrics for these activities are not yet > here. Or writing books for that matter! Very good points, I cannot agree more. Is something that needs to be done and none of us is in a position to do it better than Matthew is. Regards, Ovidiu