Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 25159 invoked by uid 500); 27 Feb 2003 10:54:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 25143 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2003 10:54:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO pulse.betaversion.org) (217.158.110.65) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Feb 2003 10:54:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 27402 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2003 10:54:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO apache.org) (stefano@80.105.91.155) by pulse.betaversion.org with SMTP; 27 Feb 2003 10:54:12 -0000 Message-ID: <3E5DEE77.5080600@apache.org> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 11:54:47 +0100 From: Stefano Mazzocchi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030202 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: [proposal] Pruning up the CVS tree for real References: <3E5D65C4.6030509@apache.org> <3E5DBD49.4090804@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <3E5DBD49.4090804@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > > > Stefano Mazzocchi wrote, On 27/02/2003 2.11: > ... > >> Yes, CVS branches are evil. I'm starting to realize that. > > > Ok, so you're starting to understand something about the use of > cocoon-sandbox? I still consider a separate module for alpha stuff a cimitery-wannabe. >> Yes, we'll seriously think about moving to subversion when the tools >> come. > > > And when we'll move to it, I'd like to nuke the sandbox. We can use > "branches" (see the SVN docs to see why I used the "") for alpha code. > Now me thinks it's impractical. (we can also make it stating that it > *will* be nuked upon passing to SVN). IMHO this holds true also for > alpha blocks. I mean *really* alpha ones, not ones that are now marked > unstable but are really in beta. I say we cleanup the scratchpad, finish up the build system and see what happens before starting new modules. I don't want another xml-cocoon-apps born-dead module. -- Stefano Mazzocchi Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate [William of Ockham] --------------------------------------------------------------------