Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 60791 invoked by uid 500); 27 Feb 2003 10:16:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 60773 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2003 10:16:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO pulse.betaversion.org) (217.158.110.65) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Feb 2003 10:16:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 26351 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2003 10:17:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO apache.org) (stefano@80.105.91.155) by pulse.betaversion.org with SMTP; 27 Feb 2003 10:17:01 -0000 Message-ID: <3E5DE5C0.4030803@apache.org> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 11:17:36 +0100 From: Stefano Mazzocchi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030202 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: [proposal] Pruning up the CVS tree for real References: <3E5D7E05.9040809@verizon.net> In-Reply-To: <3E5D7E05.9040809@verizon.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > Pier Fumagalli wrote: > >> On 27/2/03 1:11, "Stefano Mazzocchi" wrote: >> >> >> >>> Pier Fumagalli wrote: >>> >>> >>>> - Create a new repository called "cocoon-2.0" and copy over the >>>> cocoon-2_0_5 >>>> branch of "xml-cocoon2" (clean checkout, and re-import) >>>> >>> >>> cocoon-2.0.x >>> >> >> >> I called this "cocoon-2.0", and it contains the latest copy of the >> "cocoon_2_0_3" branch... >> >> >> >>>> - Create a new repository called "cocoon-2.1" and copy over head >>>> from the >>>> main "xml-cocoon2" repository (clean checkout, and re-import) >>>> >>> >>> cocoon-2.1.x >>> >> >> >> Same as above, I called it cocoon-2.1... >> >> Should I rename all the "new" repositories? I did it before seeing your >> email, and I went ahead with my own naming scheme... >> > > I like your naming scheme, hope it sticks for a while. Extra ".x" does > not really adds much value anyway. No problem for me with the current naming schema. -- Stefano Mazzocchi Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate [William of Ockham] --------------------------------------------------------------------