Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 24546 invoked by uid 500); 21 Feb 2003 15:19:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 24506 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2003 15:19:48 -0000 Received: from host4-4.pool62211.interbusiness.it (HELO linux.local) (62.211.4.4) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Feb 2003 15:19:48 -0000 Received: from apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by linux.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BAD884D35 for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 16:17:43 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <3E564317.6010803@apache.org> Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 16:17:43 +0100 From: Gianugo Rabellino User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030210 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: [proposal] Removing the scratchpad References: <3E563F8A.50207@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <3E563F8A.50207@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > The scratchpad was born as a place where things can be worked-on on > alpha status, but it because a place where things are dumped and forgotten. > > I propose to dump it and to move the code into 'alpha blocks'. > > Thoughts? Big +1 on the principle, but with a practical question: what happens to "scratchpad" code that belongs to the core and not to a given block (say new/revised pipeline implementations)? Should we have a "core" block too? Ciao, -- Gianugo Rabellino Pro-netics s.r.l. http://www.pro-netics.com