Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 46931 invoked by uid 500); 5 Feb 2003 13:33:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 46918 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2003 13:33:26 -0000 Message-ID: <3E411284.6080508@verizon.net> Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 08:32:52 -0500 From: Vadim Gritsenko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: News from the Websphere 5.0 front References: <97CBFQL631C751WRL53XUPLWB095.3e40f6f3@WRZ22121> In-Reply-To: <97CBFQL631C751WRL53XUPLWB095.3e40f6f3@WRZ22121> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out005.verizon.net from [141.156.187.247] at Wed, 5 Feb 2003 07:33:26 -0600 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Gernot Koller wrote: >04-Feb-03 05:01:59, Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > > > >>Pier Fumagalli wrote: >> >> >> >>>Y'all... Should we do a double fix to both Cocoon and Jetty at the same >>>time? >>> >>> >>If this is in regards to redirects... I think consensus is to implement >>servlet spec in Cocoon, and don't rely on (buggy) engines like >>websphere. It means, in HttpEnvironment sendRedirect method make >>conversion from relative to absolute URLs. >> >> > >Ignoring, that Cocoon might then not run on engines like websphere ?? > Should read: Ensuring that Cocoon will then work on engines like websphere (and unpatched jetyy). >I hope I misunderstood you here.. > I think so. Vadim >Gernot > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org