Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 72939 invoked by uid 500); 3 Feb 2003 16:44:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 72920 invoked from network); 3 Feb 2003 16:44:46 -0000 Message-ID: <3E3E916B.1030908@apache.org> Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2003 16:57:31 +0100 From: Gianugo Rabellino User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3a) Gecko/20021212 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: [OT rant] there must be some way out of here... References: <3E3E915D.4040306@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <3E3E915D.4040306@apache.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.72.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > I'll never use Tomcat again. Period. The phylosophy behind it (big > servlet engine, light http stack on top) is plain wrong. > > mod_jserv is not supported anymore. :( > > mod_jk is piece of [insert your favorite nasty word here] (who is the > genious that invented the concept that the servlet engine should > generate the configuration file for the web server module?). > > mod_jk2 is even worse (who invented its configuration format must think > in sanscrit and never heard of virtual hosts). > > mod_webapp (which is the only *human* one) is dead. This made me remember those golden days when I was sticking to JServ and.refusing to switch to Tomcat unless being forced to... looks like I was forward looking then. :-/ > Tomcat is getting bigger and slower every day and must do only one > stupid thing (connect a URI to a servlet, dah!) that we were able to do > in jserv with some 120Kb of java code. Talking about flexibility > syndrome. Hello? we already have a damn good web server!!! just because > you can't configure it doesn't mean you have to rewrite one from > scratch. get a life. Can't agree more. Even if when it comes to most sophisticate features (HTTP 1.1 as a first example) I understand that it's not that easy to implement a servlet engine in just a few lines of code. > I'm sick of this. So am I. > And I'm not alone. Definitely. > Enough talking, expect action. Expect cooperation here! Ciao, -- Gianugo Rabellino CTO Pro-netics s.r.l. http://www.pro-netics.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org