Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 24333 invoked by uid 500); 5 Feb 2003 16:09:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 24278 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2003 16:09:52 -0000 Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 17:07:52 +0100 To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: [BUG?] Caching and non caching pipelines - any changes lately ? Message-ID: <20030205160752.GA10091@kompuart.pl> Mail-Followup-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org References: <20030205111326.GB21501@kompuart.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i From: ouzo@kompuart.pl (Leszek Gawron) X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 03:28:09PM +0100, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > AFAIK there were no changes to the caching in the last week. > Do you get the correct behaviour when you turn off caching? Yes I did. It works fine when noncaching pipeline is used. Please mind that caching version also works correctly for some time (as I said 2 hours in development environment - one client, url queried about once per 5 minutes) I'm not quite sure that this is be last week's change. Previous cocoon build I used was about a 1 - 1.5 month old ( cannot say exactly ). regards LG -- __ | / \ | Leszek Gawron // \\ \_\\ //_/ ouzo@vip.net.pl _\\()//_ .'/()\'. Phone: +48(600)341118 / // \\ \ \\ // recursive: adj; see recursive | \__/ | --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org