cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefano Mazzocchi <stef...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [proposal] Pruning up the CVS tree for real
Date Thu, 27 Feb 2003 10:54:47 GMT
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> 
> 
> Stefano Mazzocchi wrote, On 27/02/2003 2.11:
> ...
> 
>> Yes, CVS branches are evil. I'm starting to realize that.
> 
> 
> Ok, so you're starting to understand something about the use of 
> cocoon-sandbox?

I still consider a separate module for alpha stuff a cimitery-wannabe.

>> Yes, we'll seriously think about moving to subversion when the tools 
>> come.
> 
> 
> And when we'll move to it, I'd like to nuke the sandbox. We can use 
> "branches" (see the SVN docs to see why I used the "") for alpha code. 
> Now me thinks it's impractical. (we can also make it stating that it 
> *will* be nuked upon passing to SVN). IMHO this holds true also for 
> alpha blocks. I mean *really* alpha ones, not ones that are now marked 
> unstable but are really in beta.

I say we cleanup the scratchpad, finish up the build system and see what 
happens before starting new modules. I don't want another 
xml-cocoon-apps born-dead module.

-- 
Stefano Mazzocchi                               <stefano@apache.org>
    Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate [William of Ockham]
--------------------------------------------------------------------



Mime
View raw message