Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 83286 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jan 2003 13:44:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 83275 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2003 13:44:53 -0000 From: "Carsten Ziegeler" To: Subject: RE: Next Release Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 14:44:55 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <3E2D4A8C.6070901@anyware-tech.com> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on PBSN1/Systeme und Netzwerke(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 21.01.2003 14:44:50, Serialize by Router on PBSN1/Systeme und Netzwerke(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 21.01.2003 14:44:52, Serialize complete at 21.01.2003 14:44:52 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Spam-Rating: 208.185.179.12.available.above.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N Sylvain Wallez wrote: > > We've always said that alpha-status means that APIs can change. So > what's the purpose of making an alpha release ? > > Well, this has more to do with marketing and public relations : an alpha > release shows to the outside world that some work is happening on > something new and that some level of runtime stability has been reached > on this new thing. > Absolutely, thanks Sylvain. Now, guess which question is asked most if you talk about Cocoon: when will 2.1 released? There are many users already using Cocoon 2.1-dev and they want an official release. With an alpha release we show that we are trying to reach this. > So I'm +0 on an alpha release ! > I think, if the flow problems are solved we could also make a beta release as it seems that most other parts are stable now. The problem with a release is, that I guess (although I haven't tested it yet) that the build system is not correctly building the distribution anymore. And we have to decide what the binary dist will be etc. With the recent changes (which are excellent) of the blocks and mocks, this has become a little bit more difficult. So we need some work to be done here. Carsten --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org